Van Helsing 2004 Movie Poster |
When it comes to movies that are offspring of the famous Dracula, there was one that I found that was different from the rest. Directed, produced, and written by Stephen Sommers, Van Helsing stars Hugh Jackman as a famous monster hunter, Van Helsing. Painting Van Helsing in a completely different light, this film goes into the lives of some of the more prominent characters from Bram Stoker's Dracula, along with other fictional characters such as Frankenstein.
Touching right away on a whole new outlook of what Bram Stoker might have imagined for this story, Van Helsing started with black and white in Frankensteins "lab". Immediately showing Dracula played by Richard Roxburgh, the movie soon moves on to focus on Van Helsing in his demon/monster hunting glory. After making his way to Transylvania, the film unfolds to show Draculas brides, Van helsings mission, and Draculas plans. The film shows all of this unfold while going over the top in some places, and adding love to the mix as well (1).
While this movie focused on Van Helsing, the references and pieces of plot that were taken from Dracula were constantly in play. Whether it was talking about setting, characters, or the general plot, the movie still had many ties to the book that it was based off of. One of the main points that crossed from the book to the film was that of Dracula trying to take over with his "children" (2). Throughout Bram Stokers novel Draculas overall goal was to spread his control to all over Europe; in the film this is along the same plot despite him going about it in a more fictional manner. A twist Sommers put on Draculas plans was that of his undead children. Instead of following in the path of Stoker and getting Dracula to bite people, Sommers had almost what could be called cocoons filled with the undead (1).
Draculas Brides, Van Helsing 2004 |
Overall this film was not what someone would expect when looking for something adapted from Bram Stokers Dracula, but Stephen Sommers did a great job of not only incorporating different points from the novel but putting his own spin on all of it with his imaginative and over the top ideas. While this movie could easily be looked at as any other fiction movie that touches on Dracula, I like to believe Sommers did more than that, letting his creative side flow seamlessly with that of Stokers.
Work Cited
(1) Ebert, Roger. “Van Helsing Movie Review & Film Summary (2004) | Roger Ebert.” RogerEbert.com, 7 May 2004, www.rogerebert.com/reviews/van-helsing-2004.
(2) “Van Helsing (Film).” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 1 Nov. 2018, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Helsing_(film).
(3) “Van Helsing.” IMDb, IMDb.com, 5 May 2004, www.imdb.com/title/tt0338526/.
Movie poster arena. “Van Helsing Movie Poster.” IMBd, 2004, www.imdb.com/title/tt0338526/.
I really like how you chose a different movie version from the one we are watching in class. I really like how it's different from the novel, and that it was combined with other stories such as Frankenstein. I am always interested when people combine different stories, novels, etc. to create a new crossover piece. It seemed really interesting. I'm really glad that you wrote on it, it is definitely something that I'm going to try to find and watch over break.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading about how the movie Van Helsing still took much of the story line from Dracula because sometimes it can be hard to watch a movie and expect something else or be confused along the way. So, I think that was great information to add in here. I also enjoyed how the vampire women were portrayed as more beautiful yet still disgusting in a way. The film you included was a great touch as well by giving a actual visual on what to expect from this movie.
ReplyDelete